We now enter a world in which there is not only a relationship between the parties which cannot be analysed, giving a measure of shared consciousness, which has been the assumption since Chapter 11, but also a world in which there is a oneness of heart. I do not mean to suggest by this that people, who are at heart one, lead blissfully happy idyllic lives. I do not think that most of them do. My own opinion, for what it is worth, is that you would not get the appalling cases of matrimonial cruelty in places like Barnsley, or even worse in the good agricultural stock round York, if the parties had made a marriage of convenience, upon the basis of the social contract, with a little sex thrown in for good measure. You get this sort of cruelty, much of which obviously is sexual in origin, I think, between a couple who have been in love, whose hearts became one, and whose love then became rotten, ie. turned to hatred. Much of the cruelty is so disgusting that one has to laugh about it, and is intriguing and diverting in its ingenuity, but quite obviously was not committed between people who had been at arm's length all their lives, but between people who had been very close indeed. The cruelty of someone who has been very close to you, naturally cuts with a keener edge than the cruelty of someone you have always…